.
The facts of A  R  C  H  I  T  E  C  T  U  R  E persist to grow in banality of form and function. Structures of architecture and process are driven by the assumption "there are no new ideas." Whether a conscious objective or a subconscious control, imagination lies in the reworking of previously accomplished artifacts. To presume imagination as this utterly limited task of reworking proven facts would determine architecture as a dead resource
.  w  h  a  t     i  s    t  h  e  n    t  h  e    s  t  a  n  d  a  r  d     o  f     i  m  a  g  i  n  a  t  i  o  n  ,    t  h  e    s  o  u  r  c  e     o  f     i  m  a  g  i  n  a  t  i  o  n .  
                                                               .
The solution finds a new paradigm of architecture.
Fully immersed in the digital Age, new levels of cognitive reasoning are emerging from infinitely advancing digital technologies. The advent of digital space and global networking continually alters our comprehension of actual space and time, culture and context. Technologies empower our existence, experience, and knowledge to transcend the physical. New cultures and expressions are developing as the adventures of digital space interjects its expressions back into to the physical existence. New means of exchange, methods of digital travel, and modes of communication present society with new ways of operating.

P  r  o  f  o  u  n  d     d  e  m  a  n  d  s     o  n     a  r  c  h  i  t  e  c  t  u  r  e     a  r  i  s  e     a  s     c  u  l  t  u  r  e  s     a  n  d     h  u  m  a  n  i  t  i  e  s     g  r  a  s  p     a  n  d    

          d  e  v  e  l  o  p      n  e  w     p  a  r  a  d  i  g  m  s      o  f     e  x  p  r  e  s  s  i  o  n.
                                                               .
The ideal paradigms ensue as society functions in creative cooperation with technology to advance its own existence and transcend the current status. Examples exist which utilize digital cognitive power as a function that transforms and surpasses the capability of human reasoning. In the pursuit of a serial murderer, a computer program had been created to heighten the precision of marking areas in which searches for the criminal would take place. Data was entered for the locations at which the murders had taken place. As the investigators determined that the culprit had knowledge of the neighborhoods in which the murders took place, additional data was entered relative to the amount of traffic on the streets
                                                               .
around each neighborhood. Another layer of information was added by the computer which predicted all possible routes of travel between the different areas. Given these layers of information the computer located hot spots which predicted areas where the assailant would reside. The calculating process analyzed and weighed values of high or low trafficked streets against all possible paths of travel versus the sequence of the murders in relevance to the location of the crimes. The calculations were simultaneously layered into one image which subsequently displayed the "hot spots" of activity. [needless to say the culprit was found within one of these areas] The technology utilized the investigators data to exceed the current capabilities of criminology. The computer functions were not ones of mere increased pace or scale of calculation. It was the collaboration that transcended the capabilities of both participants, the human mind and the digital technology.