|
A R C H I T E C T U R E ,
|
| . i n i t s c u r r e n t p u r s u i t s , processes, and f o r m s , breeds a fatigued built environment. The artifacts, |
|
supposedly representing our present society, appear as faceless assemblies
devoid of context, culture, and content. The
|
| assemblies are increasingly standardized parts and meterials, where the needs for repitition and expediency are the |
| controlling factors. Urban context, spatial values, formal artistry and ultimately, the human experience are irrelevant forces |
| to the status quo of manufacturing design and architecture. The equivalent to this process is an experience of passivity, |
| and a disappearance of inspiration. Resulting constructions are ignorant of the demands of society and in denial of the |
| factors shaping our culture. |
| . |
| A p r i m a r y f a c t o r i n s h a p i n g our future is the advent and proliferation of computer technology. |
| Our global culture continually advances and evolves in the wake of digital progression. As technology provides |
| electronic pathways of communication and the global exchange of ideas, society, in turn, develops new identities of |
| awareness, perception, and environment. Technology enables information to be simultaneously transposed among a |
| multiplicity of eyes and minds. Global networks and hyper-speed electronic transmissions present a unique medium for |
| communication. Information being susceptible to a myriad of viewpoints creates an extension of thought, a web of |
| . |
| knowledge. Our expansion of knowledge and exposure is only a simple instance of technology evolving our global |
| culture. Yet, as culture advances to grasp new identities of functioning amid digital technology, architecture lingers in |
| passivity, of form and function. |
| . |
| To f o r m u l a t e a n a r c h i t e c t u r e which predicts culture and context, as well as innovates form and |
| function, there must be a drastic shift in the P R O C E S S and intent of pursuing design. Collaborating computer |
| technology into process commands an innovative venue for imagining architecture. Digital tools of creation, visualization, |
| and navigation provide a new consciousness for design. Utilizing digital technology as a creative resource in the |
| investigation of design proves a new paradigm of architecture. The method expands as the digital creativity is coupled |
| with the intent to transcend our languished built environment. By using technology as a resource for imagination, a |
| unique consciousness of architecture is coupled with the very circumstances that shapes the global community. |
| . |
| The i d e a l i s a m e t h o d which produces an architecture charged with imagination and vision but still |
| grounded in an understanding of the factors governing our advancing societies; an arhcitecture much richer in context |
| and content. |
| . |
| T H E F O C U S O F P R O C E S 2 , as an independent endeavor or research and architectural services, |
| culminates all the notion of evolving technologies and ideas through the investigation and services of design and |
| visualization. Computer technology offers a medium of diversity in process, form, and comprehension, questioning the |
| standards and values of traditional architectural practice. In the hands of a knowledgeable designer, of both architecture |
| and the applications of computer technology, the medium becomes a point of departure for design. This is a |
| transformation of the traditional situation of the computer as output to a new situation where technology collaborates |
| process. The focus is to carry the ideals of design invention accross all stages of architectural creation. As a |
| collaboration with digital technology, the primary goal of proces2 is to investigate, learn and configure, wholly, new |
| processes of design creation, architectural fabrication, and building construction. |